Legal Opinion
Morgado v. City & Cnty. of S.F.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 27, 2017No. A141681PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStreeter, J.
*4Government Code 1 section 3304, subdivision (b), which is part of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (PSOPBRA) (§ 3300 et seq.), provides that "[n]o punitive action ... shall be undertaken by any public agency against any public safety officer ... without providing the public safety officer with an opportunity for administrative appeal."
In this appeal, the City and County of San Francisco (City) seeks review of the trial court's order granting injunctive relief to Paulo Morgado (Morgado), a non-probationary City police officer whose employment was terminated following…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- White v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- Lippman v. City of Oakland, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Conger v. Cnty. of L. A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- City of Calexico v. BergesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Huntington Beach v. BecerraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.