Legal Opinion
LaGrone v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2011No. A129306; No. A130030PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*935Opinion
SIGGINS, J.
The City of Oakland (City) appeals from a judgment granting Kheven LaGrone’s petition for a writ of administrative mandamus. The trial court directed that LaGrone be reinstated to his position as an engineer with the Port of Oakland, a department of the City, with backpay and benefits. We conclude the judgment is supported by the evidence. We also conclude the court’s decision to deny LaGrone’s request for attorney fees was within its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
LaGrone Is Laid Off from His Position with the Port
LaGrone worked for the Port as a civil…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Connerly v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Duarte v. Cal. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Norasingh v. LightbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Norberg v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Christensen v. Lightbourne, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Robles v. Emp't Dev. Dep't, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.