Legal Opinion

State v. Myers

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1987No. C3-87-162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The issue on this appeal is whether the value of the property taken may be considered in determining whether or not to depart durationally from the presumptive sentence for the “physical” property offense of possessing stolen property. Holding that it may be considered, we modify the decision of the court of appeals by reinstating the sentence imposed by the trial court.

■ Joseph Myers was convicted of possessing stolen property valued at $1,000 or more, Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(1) (1986), and of a less serious offense, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. The more…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrotenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. RoanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. ChaklosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. BauerlyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  5. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API