Legal Opinion

State v. Carr

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 1, 1985No. C1-83-1110PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

Following execution of a search warrant at his house, which resulted in the discovery of burglary tools, stolen property and drugs, defendant was charged by complaint with possession of burglary tools, receiving stolen goods having a value of $1,000 or more, and possession of a Schedule II controlled substance with intent to sell. Later, a deputy sheriff who participated in the execution of the search warrant was charged with an unrelated criminal offense and the prosecution moved to dismiss the drug charge. Apparently the prosecution felt it could not prove the intent to sell…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. SiegfriedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. State v. StreitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. State v. MagnanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. RodewaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API