Legal Opinion

State v. Bauerly

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 30, 1994No. C4-94-819PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

The state appeals from a sentence imposed on respondent Jody Ann Bauerly for felony theft. Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subds. 2(1), 3(3)(a) (1992). We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Jody Ann Bauerly pleaded guilty to one count of felony theft for stealing money from her employer, a St. Cloud Mu-sicland store. Bauerly admitted that she had been taking cash refunds and writing fictitious return slips from January 1993 to July 1993. The plea agreement called for Bauerly to plead guilty to the felony theft as charged and receive a stay of imposition with a cap of 15 days on probationary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. BackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  2. Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State v. PeterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. State v. RundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  5. State v. VahabiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API