Legal Opinion

State v. Blair

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1991No. C6-90-2529PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant Robert Raymond Blair appeals two convictions for criminal liability for others’ theft in connection with shoplifting by two teenage girls under his direction in two trips to one store in one day. Blair contends both convictions cannot stand because the lesser offense is based on the same criminal act on which the greater offense is based in part. He also challenges the trial court’s admission of other crimes evidence and refusal to submit a lesser included offense, an order that he reimburse extradition costs, and a double durational departure in sentencing. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glaspie v. LittleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Kruger v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
  3. State v. Lopez-SolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Sanderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Kruger v. EricksonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API