Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 7, 1986No. C4-85-764PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant was convicted under Minnesota’s prostitution statute. She was convicted of a gross misdemeanor because she has a prior conviction. She appeals, claiming the prostitution statute violates her right to privacy and is unconstitutionally vague. We affirm.
FACTS
On October 16, 1984, an undercover officer of the Minneapolis Police Department entered the Bamboo Health Club in Minneapolis. He was met by the appellant, and he asked her what types of massage were available. She told him that he could have a sauna for $10, body work for $15, a rubdown for $20, or a Bamboo Special,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rowan v. United States Post Office DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. CristSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State v. BeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Jose Refugio Gomez-Gutierrez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. OanesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996