Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1961No. 38,070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered pursuant to a verdict in favor of plaintiff.

The action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained when plaintiff was gored by a bull owned by defendant. The facts are not seriously in dispute.

Plaintiff, who is the father of defendant, has lived all of his life on the farm where the injuries were sustained. He was 73 years of age at the time of the trial. Defendant and his family occupy one house and plaintiff and his wife another. Plaintiff and defendant operated the farm as partners for some time, but about a year before…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Muller v. . McKessonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Molloy v. . StarinNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  3. Fake v. AddicksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. Lavalle Ex Rel. Lavalle v. KauppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Fye v. ChapinMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Butaud v. Suburban Marine & Sporting Goods, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Clark v. BringsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Boitz v. PreblichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Ryman Ex Rel. Ryman v. AltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Matson v. KivimakiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API