Legal Opinion
Lund v. Brown
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 2000No. 981778PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Justice:
T1 Plaintiffs below, Kurtis Lund (Lund) and B & B Drywall (B & B) appeal the trial court's denial of their motion to vacate an entry of default judgment. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
12 In September 1996, Fon and Sally Brown (the Browns) hired Lund to construct a house. Lund hired B & B as a subcontractor to install drywall. Lund worked on the house between October 1996 and May 1997. B & B worked on the house in April and May 1997. When the Browns refused to pay them for their work, Lund and B & B filed me-chanie's liens.
T3 In November 1997, Lund and B & B filed an action…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Leon Schwab v. Bullock's Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Charles A. RawlingsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Archuleta v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Arbogast Family Trust v. River Crossings, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Tucker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.