Cooper v. Deon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.
The defendant appeals from (1) an order denying her motion to set aside a default judgment, taken against her in a quiet title action, and her motion to permit her to answer, and (2) from an order denying her a continuance in order that she might file “reply affidavits as to new matters” set up in plaintiffs’ counteraffidavits. The latter is not an appealable order, but may be reviewed on the appeal from the order denying the defendant relief from her default.
In support of her motion the defendant filed two affidavits, her own and that of her physician. They offer as…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schwerin v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weinberger v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Warren v. Dixon Ranch Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
- Freeman v. SullivantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Brainard v. BrainardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Nelson v. BerggrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Estate of StandingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950