Legal Opinion

Rabb v. . Covington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The question presented for our decision is whether a sale of food by a retail dealer to a customer for his immediate consumption carries with it a warranty that the food is merchantable and fit for human consumption when the article of food is contained in a sealed package, affording no opportunity for inspection of its contents, and was bought in that condition by the retailer from a manufacturer. The plaintiff contends that there is such a warranty and that it is not abated or disturbed by the fact that the food was at the time of its purchase by defendants and its sale to plaintiff in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Thomason v. Ballard & Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Thomason v. . Ballard Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Colonna v. Rosedale Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Terry v. Double Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Davis v. RadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API