Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lilly Co. v. . Saunders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 27, 1939PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of pharmaceutical and biological commodities, which it sells and distributes under its own identifying brands, brought this action under chapter 350, Public Laws of 1937, known as the "North Carolina Fair Trade Act," to restrain the defendant, a retail druggist, from reselling these products at cut rate prices, in violation of the statute. The case was heard before Stevens, Jr., J., at March Term, 1939, New Hanover Superior Court, upon an agreed statement of facts, without the intervention of a jury.

The act under consideration aims at the maintenance of resale…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. New York Trust Co. v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Bulova Watch Co. v. Brand Distributors of North Wilkesboro, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. Bulova Watch Co. v. Zale Jewelry Co. of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API