Russell v. First National Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The first count in the plaintiff Hazel M. Russell’s declaration is in substance that there was a breach of an implied warranty that the lamb patties were fit for human consumption. We believe the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit on this count was properly denied. The evidence was undisputed that she purchased these patties for her own exclusive consumption, as she was on a diet and could eat no meat except lamb or fowl, and gave the wherewithal to the cashier in the store in the form of a check endorsed by her husband to pay for them. The law in this State, as well as the general rule, is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Truslow Fulle, Inc. v. Diamond Bottling CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Pearl v. Wm. Filene's Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Morin v. StrombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Pabon v. Hackensack Auto Sales, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Potthoff v. AlmsColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dudley v. Business Express, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.