Legal Opinion

H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. Adler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 9, 1983PublishedCited by 227 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

SCHREIBER, J.

This ease focuses upon the issue of whether accountants should be responsible for their negligence in auditing financial statements. If so, we must decide whether a duty is owed to those with whom the auditor is in privity, to third persons known and intended by the auditor to be the recipients of the audit, and to those who foreseeably might rely on the audit. Subsumed within these questions is a more fundamental one: to what extent does public policy justify imposition of a duty to any of these classes?

I

The issues herein arose on…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Ossining Union Free School District v. AndersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Raritan River Steel Co. v. Cherry, Bekaert & HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Cammer v. BloomDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API