Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

Holt v. Mann

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 28, 1936PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.

This is an action of contract upon an implied warranty of fitness in the sale of half a ham by the defendant, a retail dealer in meats, to the plaintiffs’ testator, Arthur C. Badger. The ham was ordered by his wife on September 23, 1933. It was selected by the defendant, delivered by him at the Badger house, and charged to Arthur C. Badger. The next day it was boiled for three hours or more, and then baked for an hour, in accordance with approved directions for cooking given in a well known cook book. Then it was served at noon. It appeared well cooked. All the persons, nine in number…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Gearing v. BerksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Farrell v. Manhattan Market Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Schuler v. Union News Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  3. Flynn v. Growers Outlet, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Timmins v. F. N. Joslin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Bruns v. Jordan Marsh Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API