Legal Opinion
Morrissette v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided June 28, 1974No. 6675PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
In 1973 Doris Morrissette Przybyla was a tenant of her sister-in-law, Lucienne Morrissette, plaintiff in the present third-party action, in premises in Nashua owned and partly occupied by Lucienne. Allegedly one of the terms of the tenancy was that the tenants should mow the lawn. On June 22, 1963, Doris Przybyla was injured while operating a rotary lawn mower furnished by Lucienne on the leased premises. The mower had been purchased from defendant Sears, Roebuck 8c Company by Lucienne’s husband in 1961. On May 15, 1969, Doris Przybyla brought a negligence action against Lucienne Morrissette.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Burbage v. Boiler Engineering & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Crawford v. Pope & Talbot, Inc. Lucibello v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Parfait v. Jahncke Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Town of Hooksett School District v. W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1984
- Roland Bosse v. Litton Unit Handling Systems, Division of Litton Systems, Inc., Third Party v. Werner Associates, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Cannons Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1989
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Maddux Well ServiceWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.