United States v. Clerkley
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants, together with others, were indicted by a federal grand jury on a charge of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1955 (conducting an illegal gambling business). Defendants London, Jones and Cottman were tried before a jury and found guilty of violating the statute. Defendants Genco, Himes, Shade and Clerkley were tried without a jury and also found guilty as charged. These appeals ensued. At trial, the various defendants moved to suppress all incriminating evidence secured by wiretap. The district judge denied this motion, holding that the government fully complied with the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sgro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Truong Dinh Hung, United States of America v. Ronald Louis HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. HermanekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. John Leslie Leavis, Jr., A/K/A Johnny, A/K/A John LeviesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. DorfmanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.