Legal Opinion
United States v. Hermanek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 15, 2002No. Nos. 99-10092, 99-10137, 99-10142, 99-10143, 99-10146 and 99-10197PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
I. Overview
Appellants Robert Hermanek, Robert Rutherford, Anthony Flowers, Sheldon Johnson and Jerry Fiorillo were charged with conspiring to distribute cocaine, possessing cocaine with intent to distribute and related offenses. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The government alleged that Flowers was at the center of a large-scale cocaine trafficking organization, that Fiorillo and Hermanek were Flowers’ suppliers and that Johnson and Rutherford were among Flowers’ larger customers. In 1994, agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Drug Enforcement Agency…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Joan McKennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.