Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Cieslewics
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 26, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 20, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant resigned from her employment in the take-out food department at a grocery store for personal and noncompelling reasons. Claimant testified that on the last day of her employment, she developed a migraine headache caused by her coworkers who were in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of FradysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of CioffiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of DunsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MullenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of OttoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of GrushkoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of PeakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of VazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of HaggertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of Paul-MarseilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004