Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Grushko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 29, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was employed as a bus driver until he took advantage of an ongoing early retirement incentive program that was part of his collective bargaining agreement with the union and relocated to Florida. Although claimant offered several reasons for retiring, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was disqualified from receiving…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of ShubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of CieslewicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of MoisidesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re the Claim of CuttittoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LuchtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of AgranovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re the Claim of ScismAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. In re GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. In re the Claim of SwiechAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API