Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Peake

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap*744peal Board, filed February 28, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant began working for the employer as a sales manager and service technician in February 1997. During the summer of 2002, he became dissatisfied when the employer restricted the use of his company cell phone to walkie-talkie mode, precluding him from using it to contact his family. The employer was experiencing various problems with claimant’s work…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChereshnevAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. In re the Claim of CieslewicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of FierroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of ShabbirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of BehuniakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of HayesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API