Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Paul-Marseille

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*923Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 10, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as a receptionist and a billing clerk at a medical office. On August 26, 2002, her supervisor advised her that he was letting her go with two weeks’ notice. Claimant left work that day, never to return. She filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, indicating that she was fired. After she began collecting benefits,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of CieslewicsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API