Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Mehdizadeh

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 2003No. B161117PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

Petitioner David Nissan Mehdizadeh is a probationer covered by the drug treatment and rehabilitation provisions of Proposition 36 (Pen. Code, § 1210.1). His petition for habeas corpus alleges the trial court acted unlawfully when it summarily revoked his probation and incarcerated him pending a formal hearing on alleged first time violations of drug-related conditions of his probation. He contends under Proposition 36 the trial court cannot revoke probation when a probationer violates a drug-related probation condition for the first time unless the court finds- the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. TilehkoohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. People v. EsparzaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Aguiar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. People v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. People v. TannerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API