Legal Opinion

People v. Tanner

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 2005No. D043571PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment committing Lorenzo Lee Tanner to a five-year prison term after he admitted a third and fourth violation of drug-related conditions of probation and the court terminated his probation under Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (the Act). (The Act is codified at Pen. Code, §§ 1210, 1210.1 and 3063 (all statutory references are to this code unless otherwise specified) and division 10.8 (commencing with § 11999.4) of the Health & Saf. Code.)

Tanner raises numerous arguments in support of his contention the trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. VickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. FarellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re DeLongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. MurilloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. People v. HazleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. P. v. Rodriguez CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API