Legal Opinion

People v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 2004No. A104284PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

Defendant had pleaded guilty to a crime covered by Proposition 36, the Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act, and received probation. At the hearing for his second drug-related violation of probation, defendant stipulated to an upper term sentence of three years as a condition of receiving outpatient treatment. Prior to the agreement, the trial court had determined that residential treatment was appropriate. After receiving probation and outpatient treatment, defendant committed a non-drug-related violation of his probation. The court revoked probation and sentenced him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. FloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Cowan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ThurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. MuldrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. People v. KendrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. SizemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. ThurmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API