People v. Schrecengost
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the People’s contention, the waiver by defendant of the right to appeal as a condition of his plea of guilty does not foreclose his present challenge to the voluntariness of the plea (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10). We reject the contention of defendant that his plea of guilty was not voluntarily entered. He contends that he pleaded guilty only because his codefendant would not be *938permitted to plead guilty if defendant failed to do so and his codefendant faced certain conviction if forced to go to trial. “[W]hile a connected plea…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MoissettNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. PeavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. NormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. RolandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.