Legal Opinion

People v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 8, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to defendant’s contention, the plea colloquy establishes that defendant’s plea was voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently entered (see, People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543-544). Supreme Court advised defendant of the rights that she was waiving, and defendant indicated that she understood those rights, and confirmed that she had not taken any drugs, alcohol or medications or suffered from any physical or mental conditions that might affect her ability to understand the plea bargain. Defendant stated that she had sufficient opportunity…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. SchrecengostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. NimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. People v. JosephAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API