Legal Opinion
People v. Peavy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to *1083withdraw his plea of guilty to rape in the first degree. We disagree. A motion to withdraw a guilty plea is addressed to the sound discretion of the court (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v De Jesus, 199 AD2d 529). The record establishes that defendant was advised of his rights and that his Alford plea (see, North Carolina v Alford, 400 US 25) was knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered with a full understanding of its consequences (see, People v Alfieri, 201 AD2d 935, lv denied 83 NY2d 908).…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- People v. De JesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. AlfieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SchrecengostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. MuccigrossoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. DaymontAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. McLeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.