Legal Opinion

People v. Moissett

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1990PublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We conclude that there is support in the record for the Appellate Division’s determination that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal and that a waiver of the right to appeal was an integral part of the negotiated plea. Significantly, defendant does not contend that the plea itself was not voluntary, knowing and intelligent. Rather, relying on People v Seaberg (74 NY2d 1), he argues that the waiver of the right to appeal was infirm because the court failed to conduct…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by281 opinions

  1. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. The People v. Rasaun SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. People v. KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API