Legal Opinion

People v. Seaberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1989PublishedCited by 1,769 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

These appeals question whether criminal defendants may waive their rights to appeal as part of a negotiated sentence or plea bargain. In People v Smith, defendant waived his right to appeal as part of a bargained plea entered before trial. In People v Seaberg, defendant waived his right to appeal a judgment entered on a jury verdict in exchange for a favorable sentence. Defendants maintain that such waivers are invalid per se. Defendant Seaberg also contends that even if such waivers are valid, his should not be enforced because it was involuntary. We hold that…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,769 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. The People v. Rasaun SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 2015

1,764 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API