Rown v. Brake-Testing Equipment Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
In this cause in the District Court an interlocutory decree was made and entered on the 29th day of May, 1929, in favor of the plaintiffs-appellees, in accordance with the prayer of the bill of complaint. On appeal to this court the decree of the District Court was reversed with instructions that the said suit be dismissed, finding that the plaintiff’s patent was invalid and also that there was no infringement. 38 F.(2d) 220. The mandate of this court when received by the District Court was duly entered, and in accordance therewith the final decree of the District Court was entered on or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- In re Gamewell Fire-Alarm Tel. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1896
- Society of Shakers v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hagerott v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Rothschild & Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Hagerott v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983