National Brake & Electric Co. v. Christensen
Supreme Court of the United States
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the -opinion. contended, inter alia, that the decree, in.
Read the full summary
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the -opinion. contended, inter alia, that the decree, in. Pennsylvania was the first final one, the Wisconsin decree being merely interlocutory, and that it was the duty of the Circuit Court of Appeals in the latter case to give effect to the Pennsylvania decree,' by recalling its mandate, setting aside its affirming order and directing the District Court to vacate its own former decree and enter one adjudging the patent invalid. They claimed that the case was one with Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
Suit was brought by Christensen and the Allis-Chalmers Company in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against the National Brake & Electric Company for infringement of patent to Christensen No. 635,280 for improvement in a combined pump and motor; . After answer, the petition was amended so as to set up that Christensen before the issue of the patent No. 635,280 had obtained a patent for the same invention under No. 621,324, and that because of defects the same had been returned to the Commissioner of Patents, and the new letters issued for the same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- MacFadden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Rubber Co. v. GoodyearSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pierce v. Cook & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Claudiatte Pierce, as Surviving Widow of Teddy Joe Pierce, Deceased, for Herself and Letitia Pierce, Minor Child of Teddy Joe Pierce, Deceased v. Cook & Co., Inc., Stephen Ellenwood, a Minor Under the Age of 21 Years, Who Sues by Judson Ellenwood, as Next Friend v. Cook & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.