Legal Opinion
Rothschild & Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1931No. 6362PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
This is a second appeal in eases involving substantially the same questions of law and of fact.
On March 18, 1929, Gust Hedin, one of the appellees, filed a complaint before the Deputy United States Compensation Commissioner for the Fourteenth Compensation District, who is-the other appellee herein. Hedin claimed- to have suffered an injury while stowing lumber for Rothschild & Company, a stevedoring company, one of the appellants, and brought His suit under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act.(33 USCA §§ 901-950).
On September 11, 1929, the deputy…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brown v. County of Buena VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kingsbury v. BucknerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kennedy v. Georgia State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fraser v. DoingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Rogers v. Consolidated Rock Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Great Western Stage Equipment Co. v. IlesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.