Legal Opinion

Mercer v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 8, 1983No. 591; CA A26415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The state appeals from a pretrial order granting petitioner’s “motion for return or restoration of things seized.” ORS 133.633.1 We reverse and remand.

The items that the trial court ordered returned to petitioner included 11 marijuana plants, cultivation equipment, assorted “pot” paraphernalia (pipes, roach clips and the like) and related objects. Petitioner claims that these items were unlawfully seized, because the search warrant authorizing the seizure did not adequately designate the property to be searched.2

Given the narrow issue before us, we look only to the search warrant and its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CortmanOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Filipetti v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API