Legal Opinion
Scott v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided October 27, 1983No. 81-3697, 3-82-0076 and 3-82-0077PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This action to recover the payment of wagering excise taxes, penalties, and interest 1 is before this Court on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. In their motion for summary judgment plaintiffs allege that the only evidence the Internal Revenue Service used in assessing the wagering tax at issue was obtained in violation of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-20, and that suppression of the evidence is the proper remedy for this violation. Defendant opposes this motion, asserts that disclosure was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berger v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GilmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- John W. Spatafore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Boettger v. MiklichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- In Re Electronic Surveillance. Robert E. Berg v. Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Matter of Electronic SurveillanceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.