Legal Opinion
In Re Orosco
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 1949No. Crim. 2587PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The principal question is whether in a proceeding of this kind, the recital in the judgment of the juvenile court that due notice of the hearing, in which a child was declared a ward of that court, was given to its mother, is binding on this court.
The petition sets forth that on August 5, 1945, Martha Ann Orosco was born to Lupe Orosco (one of the petitioners), an unwed mother; that on September 27, 1945, she was placed with Amanda and Herman Bilgera (the other petitioners). On January 6, 1946, the mother consented to the adoption of the child by the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re Matter of HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Linger v. WeissOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re EtheringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. Bryon S.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re EtheringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re MoilanenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.