Legal Opinion

In Re Etherington

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1950No. Crim. 5070Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.2d 863 (1950)

In re NORMAN ETHERINGTON on Habeas Corpus.

Crim. No. 5070.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Sept. 12, 1950.

Arthur De Beau Carr for Petitioner.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, and C.J. Scott, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

SPENCE, J.

By means of habeas corpus, Freda Mickelson, the mother of Norman Etherington, a minor, seeks his release from custody after he was adjudged by the Juvenile Court of Nevada County to be a ward of the court and committed to the California Youth Authority. She challenges upon these grounds the jurisdiction of the court to make the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Millard v. Supreme Council of American Legion of HonorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In Re StaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Estate of IngramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. In Re EtheringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API