Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Etherington

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1950No. Crim. 5070PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

By means of habeas corpus, Freda Mickelson, the mother of Norman Etherington, a minor, seeks his release from custody after he was adjudged by the Juvenile Court of Nevada County to be a ward of the court and committed to the California Youth Authority. She challenges upon these grounds the jurisdiction of the court to make the order of commitment: (1) failure to serve notice of the hearing of the juvenile court proceedings upon her as required by law (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 726); and (2) insufficiency of the findings to justify removal of said minor from her custody (Welf. & Inst. Code, §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re StaserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. People v. HartmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. In Re OrtizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. SpiersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. In Re OroscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re SteinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. In Re MoilanenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. AadlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Knight v. Superior Court of Tehama CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API