Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 10, 2002No. 2001-1795PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 37.] THE STATE EX REL. SARTINI, PROS. ATTY., ET AL., APPELLEES, v. YOST, JUDGE; O’BRIEN, AUD., APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. Sartini v. Yost,
2002-Ohio-3317.] Prohibition—Allegation of conflict of interest by county prosecutor in his representation of public officials—Writ sought to prohibit common pleas court judge from enforcing order permitting county auditor to engage outside counsel at county expense to represent her in a mandamus action—Court of appeals’ grant of writ affirmed, when. (No. 2001-1795—Submitted…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Corrigan v. SeminatoreOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Litty v. LeskovyanskyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Rogers v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- State ex rel. Denton v. BedinghausOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Banford v. Aldrich Chem. Co., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- State ex rel. Van Dyke v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Valentine v. PPG Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State ex rel. Wilkinson v. ReedOhio Supreme Court · 2003
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.