Banford v. Aldrich Chem. Co., Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} We must determine whether a plaintiff must present evidence of physical discomfort to recover damages for annoyance and discomfort in a nuisance claim. In addition, we must determine whether the trial court properly limited evidence at trial regarding plaintiffs’ fears and concerns about future harm.
{¶ 2} This case involved a trial on proximate cause and damages only, resulting from the evacuation of residents within a one-mile radius of a factory following an explosion. The defendant did not contest liability, and the court granted judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the existence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Renfro v. BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Sartini v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tammy Rosebrough v. Buckeye Valley High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Brown v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Brown v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- State ex rel. Food & Water Watch v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2018
- Little Hocking Water Ass'n v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.