Legal Opinion

Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1986No. 85-2015PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This case requires us to determine the circumstances in which an attorney’s pro hac vice admission can be revoked by a trial court. Attorneys admitted in other states, but not in Ohio, may request permission from the court to appear pro hac vice. 2 The decision of whether to permit representation by out-of-state counsel in an Ohio court is a matter within the discretion of the trial court. State v. Ross (1973), 36 Ohio App. 2d 185 [65 O.O.2d 316]; D. H. Overmyer Co. v. Robson (C.A. 6, 1984), 750 F. 2d 31. Out-of-state lawyers have no absolute right under state or federal law to practice in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  3. Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,157 D.H. Overmyer, Co., Inc. v. Morton S. Robson v. First National Bank of Boston, D.H. Overmyer Telecasting Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. KAVANAUGHSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  5. Eleanor Groper v. Barry P. TaffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Robert Bright v. Gallia Cnty., OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. RubinOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BuschOhio Supreme Court · 1996

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API