Legal Opinion
Diehl v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 2004No. 74768-7PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 John Diehl, appearing pro se, seeks review of a published Court of Appeals decision affirming the dismissal of his petition for judicial review by Mason County Superior Court. Diehl v. W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 118 Wn. App. 212, 75 P.3d 975 (2003). Diehl challenged the Growth Management Hearings Board’s adoption of a comprehensive plan. The trial court dismissed Diehl’s petition on the grounds that Diehl failed to comply with Civil Rule (CR) 4 when he served his petition for judicial review. Finding that the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (chapter 34.05 RCW) governs service…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Conom v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Ferry County v. Concerned FriendsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Quality Rock Products, Inc. v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.