Legal Opinion
King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1999No. 66904-0PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
— Friends of the Law and the Coalition for Public Trust (Friends) challenge a Court of Appeals decision affirming the validity of the King County Growth Management Plan’s designation of 2,500 acres of undevel*166oped land between Redmond and Duvall as an Urban Growth Area. Friends also objects to King County’s issuance of project permits for the area. We affirm the Court of Appeals’ denial of Friends’ permit challenges. However, we reverse the court’s approval of the Bear Creek Urban Growth Area designation and remand the matter to the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board for a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Skagit Surveyors & Engineers, LLC v. Friends of Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Jem Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Gayla Joy Hendren, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Quadrant Corp. v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.