City of Pasco v. Public Employment Relations Commission
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
The issue is whether an optional grievance procedure for review of disciplinary actions is a mandatory subject of collective bargaining between the City of Pasco (City) and the Pasco Police Officers Association (Union).
This question arises from uncontested facts. The City and the Union were negotiating a successor collective bargaining agreement. The Union proposed a grievance procedure. The proposal, set out in the appendix, would give employees the option of appealing disciplinary actions through the contractual grievance procedure rather than through an appeal to the Civil Service…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Contreras v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by150 opinions
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Department of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.