Legal Opinion

Ferry County v. Concerned Friends

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2005No. 75493-4PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

123 P.3d 102 (2005)

155 Wash.2d 824

FERRY COUNTY, Petitioner,

v.

CONCERNED FRIENDS OF FERRY COUNTY and Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board, Respondents.

No. 75493-4.

Supreme Court of Washington.

November 17, 2005.

Stephen Thomas Graham, Attorney at Law, Republic, for Petitioner/Appellant.

Michael David Pierson, Megan Ellen McCloskey, Riddell Williams PS, Seattle, Martha Patricia Lantz, Attorney General's Office, Lic & Admin Law Div, Olympia, Megan Ellen McCloskey, Rafel Manville PLLC, Seattle, for Appellee/Respondent.

Sheila Deirdre Lynch, Alan D. Copsey, Thomas J. Young, Attorney…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Redmond v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Callecod v. Washington State PatrolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Thurston County v. Cooper Point Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Swinomish Indian v. Western WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Stevens County v. FuturewiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  4. Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. Preserve Our Islands v. Shorelines Hearings Bd.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API