Legal Opinion

Szulerecki v. Oppenheimer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1918No. 11453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the First Branch Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on writ of error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Edmund K. JarEcki, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Appellant, Mary Szulerecki, recovered a judgment in the municipal court of Chicago against Julius Oppenheimer in an action of forcible entry and detainer "for the possession of the premises described as No. 4708 South Ashland avenue, Chicago. The Appellate Court for the First District reversed the judgment and granted a certificate of importance, and she has appealed from the latter judgment.

The premises face east, with a 25-foot front, and extend west about no feet to an alley. Appellant leased “the entire first floor and basement' of the three-story brick building known as No. 4708 South…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graves v. . BerdanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. McMillan v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  3. Fitzgerald v. QuinnIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Humiston, Keeling & Co. v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Harrington v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. SzulereckiIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Moss v. B. N. Hunding & Charles Ringer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  4. Bachenheimer v. Palm Springs Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Schultz v. KneidlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API