Legal Opinion
Gadey v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1994No. C0-93-2380PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
This court granted discretionary review, thus allowing appellant city to challenge a partial summary judgment ruling that special assessments were improperly levied between 1983 and 1992, and to challenge the remedies provided to respondents for those defective assessments. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
The Assessments
Respondents Peter Gadey, Carole Perko, Paul Perko, and Jon Perko are representatives of a class composed of owners of real property in Minneapolis on which special assessments were levied between 1983 and 1992 because of their failure…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. City Of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- DRB 24, LLC v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- Curiskis v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- Singer v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Thomas H. Johnson v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.