Legal Opinion

Wilmers v. Gateway Transportation Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 1998No. Docket 194264PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*341Gribbs, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a November 18, 1994, order of the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission, which held that plaintiff’s employer is not required to purchase a new specially equipped van to accommodate plaintiff’s work-related injuries. This Court previously denied plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal in an unpublished order, entered May 25, 1995 (Docket No. 181602), but our Supreme Court, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, has remanded the matter to this Court for consideration as on leave granted. 451 Mich 863 (1996). We reverse.

Plaintiff was injured in an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kushay v. Sexton Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Rowell v. Security Steel Processing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. R & T Construction Co. v. JudgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Weakland v. Toledo Engineering Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mickey v. City Wide MaintenanceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Fogleman v. Duke City Automotive ServicesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Herald Co. v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API