Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kushay v. Sexton Dairy Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1975No. 54831, (Calendar No. 9)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

John Kushay became totally and permanently disabled as the result of a work-related injury. Workmen’s compensation benefits were paid by his employer, Sexton Dairy Company.

This appeal concerns Kushay’s claim that Sexton Dairy is liable for services rendered in the Kushay home by Kushay’s wife, Daisy.

The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board rejected the claim for funds to compensate Daisy Kushay on the ground that her services were those "any conscientious wife would give her husband”. The Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal.

We reverse and remand to the appeal board for determination of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zaremba v. Chrysler CorporationMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. DeGeer v. DeGeer Farm Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Graf v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. A. G. Crunkleton Electric Co. v. BarkdollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. Daugherty v. City of MonettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1946

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Manley v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Douglas v. Allstate Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Van Marter v. American Fidelity Fire InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API