Fogleman v. Duke City Automotive Services
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} This case presents an issue of first impression: whether a wheelchair-accessible van is an “artificial member” within the meaning of our workers’ compensation statutes. In the present ease, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) determined that such a van is not an artificial member. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} Worker was injured in 1982 in a work-related automobile accident that left Worker paralyzed in both legs and both arms. Employer furnished Worker with a modified van. In August 1998, Worker filed a workers’ compensation complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Terry Grantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Herrera v. Quality ImportsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Kloer v. Municipality of Las VegasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Brawn v. Gloria's Country InnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Wilmers v. Gateway Transportation Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998